Controversial plans for a 190-acre solar scheme on farmland in North Yorkshire have been given the go ahead after an Inspector decided it should go ahead.

Furious objectors say the decision is a scandal and could open the floodgates to solar panels in countryside across Britain which should be protected.

The scheme by Solar developers Lightrock between Leeming Bar and Scruton, near Bedale, was thrown out by planning councillors last year. Planning officers had recommended it should be approved. The land was said by developers to be low quality grade 3b land, consultants brought in by what was then Hambleton Council said it was Best and Most Versatile quality farmland.

Planning Inspector Alison Partington who held a hearing into the appeal decided the development should go ahead.

Applicant Lightrock said the scheme would meet the annual energy needs of over 10,000 homes and the land could be used for agriculture as well as creating electricity, with connection to a sub station at Leeming Bar.

Last year more than 120 people objected to the plan with 86 writing in support of the scheme because of the benefits of clean energy.

Ms Partington said: “The Framework sets out a presumption in favour of sustainable development, and renewable energy development is central to achieving a sustainable future. The appeal scheme would make a valuable contribution to this. In addition, significant biodiversity enhancements would be achieved.

“The proposal would however be a significant development in the countryside and policy requires that any impacts are, or can be made, acceptable. The only adverse impact identified is a limited localised harm to the landscape character and visual impact. This impact can be effectively mitigated. Moreover, although I have concluded the land is not Best and Most Versatile agricultural land, even if it was, the proposal would not result in the loss of the agricultural land and there are no suitable alternative sites on lower grade land.

“Consequently, I consider the proposal would not have an unacceptable impact on, or result in the loss of, agricultural land.”

Objectors said the inspector’s conclusions are irrational when considered against the evidence presented, and were also based on draft policies, rather than planning policies in place at the time.

One local resident protested: “All solar projects not under construction should be put on hold until a clear, concise, unambiguous strategy is put firmly in place. It is patently obvious that this governments policy on solar activity on agricultural land is in a complete mess. 

“It is a scandal and could open the flood gates for these solar schemes on good quality farmland by the back door and through an ad hoc approach. We are worried about other surrounding areas, and we are extremely concerned what we have now is a precedent has been set."

Lightrock applied for costs against the council