A gang of criminals who duped North Yorkshire pensioners out of £1.2m in a house fraud scam have been brought to justice - with the council and police now attempting to recover the funds.
The sentencing of the gang brought to an end the initial phase of Operation Zagreb, a North Yorkshire Council-led investigation into a nationwide housing repair scam that cost more than 20 elderly and vulnerable victims their savings.
In many cases, the work carried out by the gang was unnecessary, and customers were charged many times the value of the jobs undertaken.
Their homes were often left in a much worse state, requiring huge amounts of money to put them right.
In total, nine men have been sentenced, with five appearing at Leeds Crown Court on Friday (July 26).
At the hearing, judge Howard Crowson said: “This was a well-organised fraud targeted at vulnerable victims.
“We all have a fear when our loved ones get older that they will be persuaded by rogue traders to part with money for unnecessary building work.
“These people had no concern for the wellbeing of the victims and were driven simply by greed."
The council’s investigation into this complex criminal network began in 2020 after officers were made aware of an elderly man in Stokesley who had been cold-called.
The man, who was in his 90s and has since died, was initially asked for £1,400 for work on his property. He was then asked for a further £400 and was only prevented from writing out a cheque for £12,000 more when a neighbour intervened.
Those sentenced for the home fraud scam were:
- Lawrence Newbury Jnr, 33, of Northwich, Cheshire. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to convert criminal property and to being a member of an organised crime group. He was sentenced to seven years.
- Lawrence Newbury Snr, 54, of Gainsborough, Lincolnshire. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud and money laundering during his trial last year. He was sentenced to six years and two months.
- John Mealin, 39, of Hartlepool. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud. He received five years and three months for these and other unrelated offences.
- Aonghus O’Reilly, 49, of no fixed abode. He was convicted at trial of conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to launder and was sentenced to three years.
- Stephen Cantello, 59, of Manchester. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to launder during his trial last year and received 17 months, suspended for two years.
- Anthony Leason, 57, of Willerby, Hull. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to launder money and breaching a restraint order. He was sentenced to 20 months, suspended for two years and 20 days of rehabilitation.
- Sam Illidge, 31, of Northwich, Cheshire. He pleaded guilty to converting criminal property and received an 18-month community order and was told to complete 100 hours of unpaid work.
- Adam Alcott, 50, of Walsall, West Midlands. He was found guilty of conspiracy to money launder and received a 20 month sentence, suspended for two years. He must also complete 150 hours of unpaid work and 20 hours rehabilitation.
- Anthony Pounder, 39, of Hartlepool. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to defraud and was sentenced to two years and three months.
- Ian Moore, 65, of Rochdale, Greater Manchester, is to be sentenced for his part at a later date.
The judge commended North Yorkshire Council trading standards for what he described as “an unassailable case”.
With the men dealt with, the focus now switches to recovering as much of the victims’ money as possible.
North Yorkshire Council’s executive member for trading standards, Cllr Greg White, said: “The sentencing of these men is not the end of the matter. We are now working with the Yorkshire and Humber Regional Organised Crime Unit to complete an in-depth financial investigation and will seek confiscation orders to recover as much money as we can for the victims.
“Depriving the offenders of the proceeds of their crimes can itself prove to be a very significant deterrent to similar offences being committed in the future.
“There were challenges around identifying the main members of the criminal network and collating the evidence necessary to show their connections but allied to the knowledge of our own highly trained staff, the ability to use the skills and resources of partner agencies proved invaluable.
“It was also important that evidence from potential victims was accurately recorded. In many instances, video interviews were carried out enabling the voices of these vulnerable people to be heard if they were unable to attend the trial themselves.”
Cllr White said while it had been for the judge to determine the appropriate sentence for each defendant, he was happy with the outcome.
“We are pleased that the court has taken this offending very seriously and that has been reflected in the sentences imposed,” he said.
In addition, the council was also granted criminal behaviour orders for Lawrence Newbury Jnr, identified as the ringleader by the judge at his sentencing, and Lawrence Newbury Snr, preventing the pair from operating roofing or building businesses in the future, cold calling to offer such work or engaging others to do those things for any business owned by them.
Cllr White said the investigation had had a profound effect on those who had been targeted.
“Victims in many of the cases we investigate have lost their life savings or experienced situations which have a massive impact on their health or wellbeing,” he said.
“We understand the effect this has on them, and our officers are specifically trained in how to retrieve the information necessary to put together a successful case while understanding and responding to witnesses’ vulnerabilities and needs.”
Anyone can get caught out by fraudsters, but Cllr White said there were tell-tale signs to look out for.
“The important thing for people to remember is that fraudsters rely on their charm and skills at making a connection with people,” he said.
“Aside from that, tactics can include building a sense of urgency into proceedings, such as a time-limited price, the need for emergency work or limited availability of a product, or playing on community involvement, such as suggesting they have done good jobs for neighbours or that they are working with the council or another agency.”
He had the following advice for residents who fear they may be being exploited or could fall victim in the future:
“I would urge people to not deal with doorstep callers or cold callers on the telephone. Reputable traders do not need to use such practices,” he said.
“We would always advise people to obtain at least three written quotes for any work and ask friends and relatives for recommendations.
“You should also not be rushed into making a decision but think it over and consider asking a friend or relative to help choose the best option.
“I’d also urge members of the community to look out for those less able to protect themselves, to check in with them if you see they are having work done and make sure they know what is being done, what it will cost and that they are not under any pressure.
“Some communities band together to run a ‘no cold calling zone’, something the council can help set up. This helps neighbours to look out for each other and intervene if they see a cold caller at someone’s home.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here